Miss Guo in November 2004 in hand of company of Cong Mou intermediary bear hired a two bedrooms, signed a building to rent a contract with intermediary. In Feburary 2005, landlord is in be informed Miss Guo to be not intermediary company worker, and she pays after chummage wants company of prep above intermediary to pay the rent of landlord, firm demand Miss Guo moves out. Miss Guo rents a contract with signing a house with intermediary company and already paid half an year reject to be moved for chummage. Landlord tells Miss Guo the court then, the court sentences landlord to win the lawsuit finally, requirement Miss Guo is moved instantly. Original, although intermediary company was signed with landlord " the building rents acting contract " , but intermediary did not allow to do sth for sb to the building rents formalities and take the place of in the contract the provision that accepts chummage. Intermediary is this building only bear hire come down, do not have the right of excessive price relet. The house that such Miss Guo young ladies and intermediary sign rents a contract to turn into invalid, miss Guo can move first only.
Comment on:
Be in from inside tripartite hand bear the right that this tripartite must clear up to whether have relet when leasing a building, otherwise, once consumer is deceived, authority thinking dimension cannot find a target.